cropped-LOGO_ANUBODHAN-removebg-preview1.png

ANUBODHAN

A Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Quarterly Research Journal

The Buddhist Theory of Causation (Pratītyasamutpāda) : A Critical Analysis

Nishi Kumari1 and Dr. Jeetendra Yadav2

1Research scholar, Department of Philosophy, University of lucknow

E-mail: nishigupta3654@gmail.com  Orcid id: 0009-0001-8587-2937

2Assistant Professor, Mahamaya Govt. Degree college, Mahona, Lucknow, Affiliated with University of Lucknow,

Email: jeetenyadava@gmail.com

IssueVolume 2 No. 1 (March 2026) Anubodhan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.65885/anubodhan.v2n1.2026.017

Abstract

In Buddhist philosophy, the problem of causation is inseparable from the explanation of change, suffering, and the possibility of nirvana. From its earliest teachings, Buddhism rejects accounts grounded in a permanent self or enduring substance and instead articulates causation through the doctrine of Pratītyasamutpāda, according to which phenomena arise and cease in dependence upon conditions. Although this doctrine occupies a central position in Buddhist thought, its adequacy as a coherent philosophical theory of causation invites critical examination.

     This paper therefore examines whether Pratītyasamutpāda can be understood as a coherent philosophical theory of causation and to what extent it remains philosophically defensible.

     This study analyses the formulation of dependent origination in early Buddhist texts, its systematic development in Abhidharma philosophy, and its critical reinterpretation in Madhyamaka thought. Particular attention is given to key philosophical problems: the issue of causal continuity in the absence of a permanent self, the question of causal efficacy within a framework of momentariness, and the problem of moral responsibility in a non-self doctrine. The paper argues that while Pratītyasamutpāda offers a powerful critique of substance-based theories of causation and presents a fundamentally relational account of conditionality, it encounters unresolved conceptual tensions when interpreted as a complete realist theory of causation. Dependent origination is therefore better understood as a philosophically significant explanatory framework within Buddhist thought rather than as a fully articulated metaphysical theory of causation.

Keywords: Pratītyasamutpāda, Buddhist Causation, Dependent Origination, Madhyamaka Philosophy, Conditionality

How to cite: Kumari, N., Yadav, J. (2026). The Buddhist Theory of Causation (Pratītyasamutpāda) : A Critical Analysis, 2(1), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.65885/anubodhan.v2n1.2026.017

Scroll to Top